On this page
Ohio: Build an auditable result instead of a sales story
Start with EIA: natural gas volume, heat content and energy units. The table below links this decision to the represented gas companies in Ohio. It does not establish service or supplier availability for every account.
Define the counterfactual
Retain what the business would otherwise have paid for the same service months and quantities. Identify whether that is an existing contract, an effective utility supply component or another dated written offer. Do not switch baselines after seeing the result.
Bridge model to invoices
Separate quantity changes from comparable price changes, then reconcile fixed charges, retained delivery and timing corrections. Preserve enrollment confirmation and invoices before presenting an actual outcome. A favorable calculator scenario is only a model.
Ohio utility application
| Gas service company | Evidence needed for the baseline | Primary reference |
|---|---|---|
| Enbridge Gas Ohio | The account’s SSO/SCO/MRR alternative versus complete supplier charges | Official program / tariff |
| Duke Energy Ohio | Utility gas-cost alternative, supplier charge and recurring account fees | Official program / tariff |
| Columbia Gas of Ohio | Appropriate utility gas-cost benchmark, supplier fees and delivery exclusions | Official program / tariff |
| CenterPoint Energy Ohio | Supplier gas and pool fees versus utility supply and delivery components | Official program / tariff |
| City of Hamilton gas utility | City gas rate, supply adjustment and service fees | Official program / tariff |
| The Energy Cooperative / National Gas & Oil | Cooperative supply, service and any applicable adjustments | Official program / tariff |
Enbridge Gas Ohio: the program detail behind this decision
Enbridge lists nonresidential Energy Choice Transportation Service separately from large-volume and daily transportation schedules. It also distinguishes Standard Service Offer, Standard Choice Offer and Monthly Retail Rate information. Use the benchmark that actually applies to the account; these labels are not interchangeable. Enbridge Oh Rates.
Apply the evidence to an account file
The case file needs comparable evidence for The account’s SSO/SCO/MRR alternative versus complete supplier charges. First establish ECTS-NR, large-volume or daily transportation category as applicable so the proposed baseline is an available alternative for this account.
Worked case: distinguish a model from an observed result
For a hypothetical 10,000-therm account, $0.80 per therm plus $20 monthly models to $8,240. An alternative at $0.76 plus $60 monthly models to $8,320. That is an $80 increase in the defined supply scope, not a saving. This conclusion is still only a scenario until eligibility, accepted enrollment and actual comparable invoices are established. Keep the same quantity and delivery period in both calculations. Do not present these invented inputs as a local client case or publish them as market rates.
Turn the review into a calculation
Compare constant supply rates and fees. Enter documented assumptions in matching energy units. Keep any charge outside both supply offers separate; the result does not establish eligibility or an available quote.
Read the Ohio utility guide for the wider service-company distinctions. Convert billed gas units using the bill’s heat-content factor when moving from volume to energy.
Sources and review notes
- EIA: natural gas volume, heat content and energy units
- Enbridge Oh Rates
- Duke Oh Tariff
- Columbia Oh Tariff
- Centerpoint Oh Tariff
- Hamilton Oh Gas
- Newark Oh Gas
- PUCO Apples to Apples natural gas
Reviewed October 16, 2026. Program information can change. Confirm the effective utility tariff, supplier availability and written offer before proceeding. Examples and planning tools are educational; they are not executable quotes or verified customer results.