On this page
Montana: Make the bid specification match the utility
Start with EIA: natural gas customer choice and eligibility. The table below links this decision to the represented gas companies in Montana. It does not establish service or supplier availability for every account.
Require an inclusion schedule
Ask bidders to mark commodity, capacity, balancing, taxes, utility transportation and account fees as included, excluded or variable. An unanswered field is an unresolved cost, not zero.
Compare risk as well as the modeled total
Read the volume measurement period, assignment process, early-exit calculation and renewal mechanism. Request a written calculation for a material overrun or closure rather than relying on a product name such as fixed or flexible.
Montana utility application
| Gas service company | Comparable price and fee scope | Primary reference |
|---|---|---|
| NorthWestern Energy | Distribution, supply, upstream transportation and any storage or aggregation fees | Official program / tariff |
| Montana-Dakota Utilities | Purchased-gas adjustment under sales versus transportation and retained gas obligations | Official program / tariff |
| NorthWestern Great Falls Gas | Great Falls gas supply and distribution components | Official program / tariff |
NorthWestern Energy: the program detail behind this decision
NorthWestern’s Montana gas schedule list distinguishes general gas distribution, general core aggregation, firm transportation and interruptible transportation. Those are different arrangements with separate conditions. Confirm the legal gas operation and both distribution and upstream obligations before treating a commodity quote as a replacement for bundled service. Nwe Mt Rates; Nwe Mt Aggregation.
Apply the evidence to an account file
Give bidders the same specification for Distribution, supply, upstream transportation and any storage or aggregation fees. Ask who is responsible for Applicable operating company, capacity and balancing responsibilities. Do not rank an incomplete answer as the cheapest complete offer.
Worked check: fees can reverse the lower rate
Assume hypothetical annual consumption of 10,000 therms. A costs $0.80 per therm plus $20 monthly: $8,240. B costs $0.76 plus $60 monthly: $8,320. B’s commodity price is lower, but its modeled supply total is $80 higher. Equal cost occurs at 12,000 annual therms under these constant-rate assumptions. These are invented inputs, not available offers, local tariffs or program thresholds. Delivery, tax, exit costs and any excluded components still require a separate review.
Turn the review into a calculation
Compare constant supply rates and fees. Enter documented assumptions in matching energy units. Keep any charge outside both supply offers separate; the result does not establish eligibility or an available quote.
Read the Montana utility guide for the wider service-company distinctions. Convert billed gas units using the bill’s heat-content factor when moving from volume to energy.
Sources and review notes
- EIA: natural gas customer choice and eligibility
- Nwe Mt Rates
- Mdu Tariffs
- Nwe Greatfalls Acquired
- Nwe Mt Aggregation
- Montana Public Service Commission
Reviewed October 16, 2026. Program information can change. Confirm the effective utility tariff, supplier availability and written offer before proceeding. Examples and planning tools are educational; they are not executable quotes or verified customer results.