On this page
Maine: Measure consumption before attributing savings
Start with DOE FEMP: boiler purchasing, sizing and lifecycle analysis. The table below links this decision to the represented gas companies in Maine. It does not establish service or supplier availability for every account.
Build the operating baseline
Record actual billing periods, estimated readings, operating hours and occupancy or production. Separate space heating from process and hot-water use where the available data permits. Explain changes before comparing periods.
Reconcile engineering and procurement
Have qualified personnel evaluate controls, equipment and service capacity. Update the contracted volume forecast after a project and review tolerance or minimum-volume terms. Verify program eligibility and preapproval before treating an incentive as funded.
Maine utility application
| Gas service company | Contract component to revisit after load reduction | Primary reference |
|---|---|---|
| Unitil | Bundled utility cost versus supplier gas, transportation, metering and data fees | Official program / tariff |
| Summit Natural Gas of Maine | Bundled utility cost versus supplier gas, transportation, metering and data fees | Official program / tariff |
Unitil: the program detail behind this decision
Maine PUC describes bundled and transportation-only choices for most commercial and industrial customers under each utility’s terms. The economics include any incremental metering and transportation costs. A registered supplier is not proof that it will quote this particular business or load. Maine Commercial.
Apply the evidence to an account file
After reducing forecast consumption, revisit Bundled utility cost versus supplier gas, transportation, metering and data fees. Ask whether the revised operating load changes Legal distribution company, commercial class and transportation metering requirements or any conditions associated with Supplier willingness to serve, transition charges and return-to-bundled-service terms.
Worked check: fixed charges do not fall with every therm
Assume hypothetical use of 10,000 therms at a constant $0.80 supply price and a $30 monthly supply fee. Modeled supply cost is $8,360. If use falls ten percent to 9,000 therms with the same price and fee, the total becomes $7,560: an $800 reduction, or about 9.57 percent of that supply total. This excludes delivery, taxes and project costs and proves no equipment result. The illustration shows why a percentage therm reduction is not automatically the same percentage dollar reduction.
Turn the review into a calculation
Build a monthly weighted budget. Enter documented assumptions in matching energy units. Keep any charge outside both supply offers separate; the result does not establish eligibility or an available quote.
Read the Maine utility guide for the wider service-company distinctions. Convert billed gas units using the bill’s heat-content factor when moving from volume to energy.
Sources and review notes
Reviewed October 16, 2026. Program information can change. Confirm the effective utility tariff, supplier availability and written offer before proceeding. Examples and planning tools are educational; they are not executable quotes or verified customer results.