On this page
Separate a physical purchase from a financial position
Volume and timing
Match the intended protection to forecast consumption and delivery months. Document what happens if production falls or a location closes.
Cash flow
Ask about deposits, collateral, margin or settlement payments where applicable. A favorable eventual result does not eliminate an interim liquidity requirement.
Governance
Define permitted products, counterparties, approval limits and reporting. Have qualified finance, accounting and legal advisers review an unfamiliar structure.
Use lower and higher price scenarios rather than a single market forecast. A hedge can reduce one exposure while introducing mismatch or liquidity risk; it is not a guarantee of lower total cost.
Worked review: forecast consumption falls after protection is arranged
Suppose a business plans to use 10,000 units but later expects only 6,000. A position intended to protect the original forecast now needs review against the smaller physical requirement. The unused 4,000-unit difference does not establish a profit or loss by itself; the actual product, settlement and contractual obligations determine the outcome.
Ask who monitors the mismatch, which changes require approval and whether any adjustment, sale-back or termination is available. Review credit and liquidity requirements independently of the expected ultimate result. Keep physical supply commitments and financial positions identifiable so a favorable result on one is not reported without the cost of the other. This scenario is a governance exercise, not a recommendation to enter a financial transaction or a promise that hedging will reduce cost.
Distinguish a physical fixed-price offer from derivatives
CFTC explains that futures have standardized terms and use margin arrangements, and that hedging addresses price risk rather than assuring profit. A small business evaluating physical gas supply should first identify whether the proposed arrangement is a supply contract or a separate financial product. Keep legal, credit, cash-flow and qualified professional review specific to that product. CFTC: futures, hedging, standardized contracts and margin.
Track the exposure that remains after protection
Document physical volume, delivery months, benchmark and local differential alongside any separate position. Revise the comparison if the facility closes, consumption falls or the contract’s reference differs from the physical bill. A favorable benchmark settlement can coexist with a less favorable delivered bill. Do not describe an instrument as a complete hedge without reviewing volume, timing and location mismatches and any liquidity requirements. EIA: Henry Hub natural gas spot-price series and units; EIA: supply, demand, weather and storage price drivers.
A governance record for a changing physical requirement
Name the approver, physical exposure owner, settlement reviewer and person monitoring credit or liquidity requirements. Match protection to delivery month, benchmark and expected quantity, then define what happens when operations change. Record any mismatch without presuming that closing a position is available or costless. Review the combined physical and financial result rather than displaying a favorable settlement alone. Obtain qualified advice on the actual product and responsibilities before commitment; a web budget exercise is not a trading recommendation.
Use the appropriate planning tool
Monthly gas budget: Use a transparent physical consumption budget as one input; this tool does not price derivatives, calculate margin or execute a hedge.
Sources and review notes
- CFTC: futures, hedging, standardized contracts and margin
- EIA: Henry Hub natural gas spot-price series and units
- EIA: supply, demand, weather and storage price drivers
Reviewed October 16, 2026. Program information can change. Confirm the effective utility tariff, supplier availability and written offer before proceeding. Examples and planning tools are educational; they are not executable quotes or verified customer results.